Political dynasties are a reality in countries around the world, but perhaps nowhere are they more entrenched than in the Philippines. The Philippines Daily Inquirer reported that 83 percent of current senators and 76 percent of House members belong to political dynasties. The phenomenon also extends to local communities. According to the Internal Policy and Budget Research Department of the Philippine House of Representatives, 9,852 of the 17,983 local elective positions, or 54 percent of the total, are held by dynasts. Some of the largest and most powerful Philippine political families currently have several members serving in the current Congress, including the Tulfos, the Villars, and the Marcos-Romualdez clan, also linked to President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.
The omnipresence of political dynasties in the Philippines has often been cited as a major cause of corruption, legislative inaction, rent-seeking and other disadvantages for investors and the business community. Academic research has documented the various ways in which political dynasties in the Philippines undermine the private sector. Mendoza et al. (2022) argue that the private sector is impacted differently depending on the region and the nature of the local industry. They find that dynasties most severely exacerbate poverty in resource-rich provinces outside Luzon, where politicians and economic elites tend to collude rather than compete and block outside investment, stifle competition, and capture extractive industries like mining, agriculture, and forestry for personal gain. In Luzon, where a more competitive and independent commercial sector exists, dynasties are somewhat limited in their predatory tendencies because the marginal benefits of encouraging economic growth outweigh pure extraction. Yet even here, the investment climate is hampered by dynastic politicians who have no accountability, who own businesses and are incentivized to use their regulatory powers to squeeze out competitors and ensure that economic gains go to a narrow circle of powerful families rather than the population at large.
Dynasties also actively corrode the institutional environment of business in more subtle but equally damaging ways. Villanueva (2025) shows how dynastic politicians treat the civil service as a “family franchise,” using state powers to manipulate public procurement processes, award contracts to corporate allies, and protect their members from anti-corruption prosecutions. This legal impunity encourages rent-seeking behavior throughout the political system and increases effective transaction costs for any investor who lacks connections to the right political families. Dynastic officials regularly face a fundamental conflict of interest between maximizing benefits for their family and maximizing benefits for the public, and in practice the family interest routinely wins out. The result is a business environment distorted by favoritism, opaque contracts and the systematic exclusion of non-aligned competitors – conditions that deter both domestic entrepreneurship and foreign investment.
Continue reading for free on The Diplomat’s new companion publication, The investor.