Politicususa represents democracy and real independent journalism, so please support our work by becoming a subscriber.
The first time Donald Trump was president, the House of Representatives welcomed him twice. At each Senate trial, the Directors of dismissal pleaded a vigorous case against Trump. They presented convincing evidence that the president of the time should have been removed from his duties, or the case of the second forbidden dismissal to request his functions again.
I will be on subsalle live at 11:00 am, to talk about the dismissal and to answer your questions, so please connect.
The vast majority of the Senate Republicans went to each trial with their minds have invented themselves, and there was never a chance that Trump will never be condemned.
It was even more revealing that the voters turned around and put a former president twice in the White House.
Enough of the voters clearly indicated that they did not care about the dismissal. There is no shame or consequence of the public for dismissal without conviction, which means that Democrats have little interest in Imper Trump again more understandable.
Semafor has reported:
“We have done this. We have already crossed this circus,” said Donovan McKinney in an interview. “How many times has Trump have been charged? He has been re-elected. He’s going nowhere. We have to find another strategy to retaliate.”
…
Elected Democrats accept the premise that Trump deserves dismissal. They also learned that the dismissal does not detract the presidents whose own party will be held.
“He was charged twice, but we do not trust that the Republicans of the Chamber and the Senate would do their job,” and withdraw Trump, told Semaor Trump, President of the Democrat Conference, Pete Aguilar, D-Calif., SEMAFOR said. “And so, this is not an exercise that we are ready to undertake.”
Democrats face a basis that wants action, but some elements do not seem to recognize the difference between effective action and do something just to do something.
The indictment is only effective if the two parties participate. If the president’s party refuses to recognize the evidence and to move, and the party bringing the articles of indictment does not have enough votes to condemn in the Senate, the indictment is an unnecessary task.
The dismissal is also ineffective if it does not contain any public or political consequences. Trump was not injured by his dismissal. Bill Clinton either. If the American people do not consider dismissal as a serious punishment which has intense consequences, then presidential dismissal is nothing more than a reprimand.
Some Democrats want to believe that there is something that can be done to repair Trump’s crisis, but indictment is not the solution.
The answer that Democrats are looking for is to win the mid-term elections and to withdraw the power of Trump, whose power is not derived from what he tries to grasp in the executive branch. Trump’s power comes from the Republicans of the Congress who covered themselves and refusing to do their work as a branch of co-equal government.
Donald Trump will be unpleasant if Democrats can reconquer all or part of the Congress.
As soon as the Democrats recognized the Chamber, Trump became a lame duck whose legislative agenda is dead. The nation is increasingly turning its eyes to the 2028 elections, and the current president will be a man without a political future.
The dismissal cannot repair the country, but your votes can.
What do you think of the limited democratic interest in dismissal? Share your reflections in the comments below.